Lecture Notes: UVA Venture Summit Panel Discussion “Windows on the Future”
University of Virginia Venture Summit
Lecture Notes: Venture Panel Discussion “Windows on the Future” March 25, 2010
A discussion of opportunities in emerging technology areas from elite venture capitalists
- Stephan Dolezalek- VantagePoint Venture Partners, moderator
- Jack Biddle-Novak Biddle Venture Partners
- Frank Levinson-Small World Group and Founder/Director of Finisar, Inc.
- Sandy Miller-Institutional Venture Partners (IVP)
- Rob Paull-Lux Capital
Dolezalek’s Introductory Slides: “Innovations at a Crossroads” (slide set unavailable, however, see recent ARPA presentation for some of the slides)
- Is the US in decline? Are we in the British empire phase– fat, dumb, happy, protectionist?
- Myth: New jobs are neither created by big business or even small business. New Jobs come from New Business. Ergo, you keep the economy healthy by nurturing new business. Cites Jeffersonian values of diversity, liberty, innovation, etc.
- Author’s Note: Dolezalek (and Biddle, too) is clearly a champion of the free market and limited government involvment.
- (See slide 2 of ARPA presentation) We are transitioning from the “5th wave” (digital networks, biotech, software information systems) to the the “6th wave” (Solar, electrical transportation, smart grid infrastructure, etc)
- 1995-2000 IT boom technically occurred at the end of the 30 year cycle of the 5th wave. We are at the beginning of the next wave.
- (See slide 3 of ARPA presentation) Who will emerge? Transformative companies emerge from difficult gauntlet/funnel (Patent–>Company–>VC–>Mezzanine–>IPO–>1 industry leader– “winner takes most/70% market”).
- (See slide 4-5 of ARPA presentation) Similarities and Differences of IT and New Energy.
Question 1: Introduction. What is the state of your industry?
Biddle
- VC business is contracting. Hasn’t been profitable since 1997 (did he mean 2007?). In its heydey, ROI was 2:1 today you’re lucky to get 50 cents/dollar. Half will go out of business. Contraction will be good for remaining companies, profitability, transparency returns.
- Novak Biddle Venture Partners are investing in a diverse portfolio (mentions Blackboard, 2tor, WealthEngine)
Levinson
- US is shrinking as the rest of the world catches up (”US had the sandbox to itself”).
- Cites Israel and Singapore as two countries that have really emerged as VC powerhouses. Singapore is exploring 85-15 partnerships (with callout rights) with private VC. His company is heavily involved in this area.
Miller
- Institutional Venture Partners (IVP) is a “late stage” capital company. Bullish on mobile market (mentions portfolio game companies Zynga and ngmoco:))
- Optimistic. Open source and hosted model makes it cheaper and easier to startup.
Paull
- Works with universities in Health and Life Sciences field.
- Cites innovative partnerships with foundations (”nondilutive capital”) that help with risk mitigation. For example, Gates Foundation helps fund research in infectious disease vaccinations.
Question 2: Big government’s role
Dolezalek
- Recent government moves (eg, Sarbox) have been designed to reduce risk for US investors. In turn, does that endanger the reward? Is the environment less attractive for entrepreneurship and competition.
Biddle
- US still has fantastic infrastructure/culture for innovation. Reiterates that government should not impede entrepreneurs. Starting a company is an “unnatural act.” Don’t put up roadblocks (taxation, etc).
Levinson
- Government can play a positive role in fueling opportunity. Cites some SBIC examples.
- But let things fail, part of the process (creative destruction)
Paull
- Promote math and sciences K-12.
- Miller agrees the focus should be on early education as higher education is still world class. Notes the panel makeup (drama, astronomy, economics, and 2 architecture majors)
- Biddle: Don’t need a CS or EE to be technical.
Question 3: Most Exciting Areas
- Biddle: health care, personalized medicine
- Levinson: clean tech
- Miller: mobile technology
- Paull: health care IT ($2.2 trillion)
Audience Questions centered on Angel Investor Thoughts, Charity, China, Government Involvment
- Dolezalek:
- On Angel Investing: Good sign when the angel is a former successful startup CEO. “Quality adult supervision in early company life.”
- Biddle:
- On China: Contrarian view. Innovative core culture (coastal, Han) for sure, but what of the rest of the population?
- On Government’s Role: Be a cheerleader but get out of the way/don’t interfere. Government should not involved itself with direct investment (artificially keeps weak companies alive).
- Levinson:
- On Angel Investing: Family/friend angels are a red flag (unreasonable valuation). Must be a true partnership (ie board makeup)
- On Government’s Role: Have universities meet with people on the street (or farm). Create technology to solve real problems.
- Miller:
- On Doing Good: Zynga used game platform to raise money for Haiti.
- Paull:
- On Government’s Role: Create community/forum of trailblazer CEOs who meet with innovators (Cambridge Model). A listserve that shares intellectual property licensing available.
Additional Coverage
- Daily Press: UVa to host annual Venture summit…UVa Venture Summit aims to find funds for researchers
- UVA Today: Ideas and Investors Will Meet at U.Va. Venture Summit March 25-26
- NBC29: Students Woo Venture Capitalists At UVA
- Newsplex: UVa Hosts Second Venture Summit
- Baltimore Sun: What’s next for venture capital?
- Pyle & Associates, LLC: UVA 2nd Annual Venture Summit

